AI has shifted from a future trend to an everyday fixture. It powers the tools we rely on, shapes the content we see and quietly streamlines the moments between waking up, working, shopping and winding down. Most of the time, we’re using it without even realising.
In business, it can help personalise recommendations, guide our journeys, filter what matters and help brands create more relevant, meaningful experiences.
In daily life, it removes friction and adds convenience. For businesses, it unlocks better insight, sharper targeting and more efficient creativity. AI is no longer something we step into. It’s woven into how we live, work and connect.
But can we trust it?
What is AI?
At its core, AI is technology that learns from patterns, adapts and makes smart predictions. Trained on vast swathes of data, these systems are designed to generate human-like text by predicting the next word in a sequence.
Think of it as the world’s most advanced version of predictive text. Sure, it’s not going to take over the world, but it’s certainly here to stay, pulling from an endless ocean of internet data to respond to our queries.
But here’s the catch: just like your phones autocorrect, it doesn’t think, it predicts. And that prediction can sometimes feel a bit lazy.
The “Lazy” AI Debate
Calling AI lazy isn’t about being mean, it’s about the shortcuts it takes. When you ask an LLM like ChatGPT a question, it doesn’t delve deep into a think tank to come up with a groundbreaking new answer. Instead, it scours a giant pool of pre-existing information, finds a pattern, and repurposes it. This approach can sometimes lead to responses that sound efficient but lack depth or originality.
Some experts, like those at the University of Washington, have even accused LLMs of “parroting”, finding patterns and regurgitating them. While this means AI is fast, it doesn’t always show the hard work you might expect.
The Trust Dilemma
Unlike machines that follow strict, predefined rules, AI makes decisions based on the data it’s trained on, leading to a “black box” problem where even its creators can’t fully explain how it comes to certain conclusions.
This lack of transparency often fuels mistrust. After all, when AI pulls information from unreliable or biased sources, it can spew out “hallucinations”, those weird little errors that don’t always reflect reality.
AI systems can only be as trustworthy as the data they’ve been trained on. If the data is skewed or incomplete, the AI’s conclusions will follow suit.
In 2023, a New York Lawyer faced court after using AI in a case. Stating he was unaware it could provide incorrect answers. The AI had in fact produced false statements, alibis and citations around the case.
The real-world implications of this can be severe, especially when AI is used to make decisions that impact people’s lives.
Building Trust in AI
AI’s journey toward reliability involves transparency, accountability, and the occasional human intervention. While LLMs like ChatGPT have made great strides by incorporating more editorially sound sources, they’re still prone to those occasional blunders.
Getting AI to work reliably in critical sectors will require constant oversight, much like training a good intern. It has potential but needs a solid mentor to guide it.
In the case of LLMs, their reliance on editorial sources is helping improve their trustworthiness, but they’re still prone to mistakes. As AI continues to evolve, we’ll need to see more regulation and ethical guidelines in place to ensure it’s being used responsibly.
The Collaboration Loop
As AI marches into 2026, we’re not just talking smarter models, we’re talking AI agents.
The next wave of systems built to take on complex tasks, streamline workflows and essentially act as backstage managers for LLMs. They refine instructions, structure problems, and feed polished prompts back into the machine.
Though impressive, these systems are not autonomous. While these agents can supercharge output, they also supercharge the risks, heightening the chance of bias, blandness, and brand-blind decision-making all compound at scale.
This is where the collaboration loop comes into play.
Humans guide AI, and AI enhances human work through agents coordinating – a bit like a digital team. In the world of integrated communications this loop isn’t just nice to have, it’s the only thing preventing a tidal wave of homogeny.
AI agents may accelerate delivery, but specialists ensure the delivery actually lands strategically, culturally, and creatively.
Is AI Lazy? Can We Trust It?
By creating bespoke ecosystems that refine user tasks and pairing it with agents dedicated to handling certain tasks, the question isn’t ‘Is AI lazy and can we trust it?’, it’s more ‘Is AI lazy, or are lazy users not pushing the boundaries of prompts to get the best result?’
AI is built to optimise for efficiency rather than creativity. If you provide it with high-quality data and ask the right questions, it can perform remarkably well.
But like any tool, it’s only as good as the hand guiding it. As AI continues to integrate, building trust will require a careful balance between its autonomy and the human expertise needed to steer it.
But can we trust it? We advise taking everything it says with a pinch of salt. AI is a useful tool when sourced from credible data, but its inherent biases and limitations make it unsuitable for high-stakes, unregulated use. The collaboration loop
Want help integrating AI into your business or optimising in the era of generative search?
As a full-service marketing and communications agency, we’ll help you harness its full potential, from strategy to execution, so you can stay ahead in the era of generative search.
About the author
Simarin Tandon | Senior Digital Marketing Manager
Having worked with brands across the Beauty &Wellness, FMCG, FinTech, and Home & Lifestyle sectors, Simarin focuses on driving acquisition and growth, whilst managing the performance team at brandnation.
A curious marketer, Simarin is always on the pulse when it comes to performance and digital updates across both paid and organic platforms.
